FREE Quote  Call Toll FREE: 1-800-322-0284
Accredited Language Services
Our BlogOur ClientsNotable ProjectsAdvertise With UsCharity WorksContact Us

Soccer vs. Football: Naming the International Game

By Alison at Accredited Language
Posted on Monday, June 21, 2010
Category: Etymology, Etymology, History, History, Sports

The soccer vs. football linguistic debate is one many US citizens are familiar with.

If you’ve ever tried talking soccer with someone of non-US origins, no doubt you’ve promptly been asked, “Oh, you mean football?”

While those of us from the States may feel like the rest of the world has it wrong, Americans are pretty much the only people in the world who have stuck to the term soccer.*

Just where does the term soccer – and the ensuing soccer vs. football debate – come from anyway, and which term is the right one?

First there was Football …

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the game generally referred to the world over as football – what we backward Americans call “soccer” – finds its origins in 19th century Britain. Prior to the middle ages, “folk football” games were played in local communities throughout modern-day Britain. Although it’s likely that these early games weren’t exactly the same as what we recognize as football today, the term is traced back to this time period when it referred to these traditional folk games which were played on foot.

The modernized version of the game which we now recognize as football developed later, around 1850. As the Industrial Revolution created more leisure time, people looked for new forms of entertainment to pass their new-found free time. Football became a popular option and many trade unions and schools created recreational teams. Although the first official leagues are thought to have risen in England and Scotland, football clubs could be found in most of Europe by the early 1900s.

… and then there was Soccer

Traditional football migrated across the pond in the mid-19th century and by the 1880s, Canadian and American teams started playing each other in informal matches. Canada soon dropped its football interest to pursue the more climate-appropriate ice hockey, however, and by the early 20th century a new sports craze was taking over in the states: gridiron football, or what the rest of the world now calls “American Football.”

In the meantime, the term “soccer” had developed. Dated to 1889, the term “socca” was initially created as an abbreviated version of “association football” which was often used to differentiate the game from “rugby football.” In the US, this shortened slang version evolved from “socca” to “socker” and finally “soccer” – and there it stayed.

Football or Soccer – Which is Right?

Whether you say football or soccer likely depends on where you were born. While Americans still stick to soccer, the rest of the world has stayed true to football. Considering the historical development of each term, it’s not really possible to pinpoint one or the other as “right” or “wrong” in the football vs. soccer debate.

If you’re American, just be prepared to defend your use of the term “soccer” or the fact that you use the word “football” in reference to “American football” when talking to football fans from other countries in the world. In any case, now that you’ve got some historical background to back you up, you should be able to get away with it.


*UPDATE: Thanks to one of our readers, who pointed out that the US is not quite alone in their preference for “soccer.” It seems that some sports fans in the British Isles refer to rugby as “football,” and use “soccer” the same way those of us in the States do. “Soccer” is also used in South Africa, Canada and Australia.

43 Responses to “Soccer vs. Football: Naming the International Game”

  1. bo Says:

    We also use the term “soccer” here in Canada (both in English and French). We used “football” both for American Football and Canadian Football (quite similar to American Football but with slightly different rules).

  2. Jacob Says:

    In the UK football is referred to as Football, and rugby as rugby or rugger.

    The US used to call football… football also, and had the USA football association long before the invention of gridiron or NFL.

    Football comes from the 1300’s when people used their feet to move a ball down a street, handball was the use of hands and hockey the use of sticks.

    Gridiron came from rugby league and is a basic sport where only two or three players ever touch the ball, most merely block. It is known worldwide for steroid usage and lack of world class athletes as participants.

    The Olympics and FIFA only accept one football.


  3. John Says:

    Your update is very strange. I am British and have been involved in football all of my life. Anyone who uses the term ‘soccer’ here is generally quickly corrected.

    Jacob’s comments are correct. As a football fan though, I tend to refer to rugby derogatively as ‘egg-chasing’!

  4. Dan at Accredited Language Says:

    Sorry for the confusion, John — we overstated the case a bit when we made that update!

    I adjusted the update to remove the implication that “soccer” is the most common term. Though while it might not be the most prevalent, neither is it unheard of!

  5. walltoall Says:

    The Irish (south of the border esp.) differentiate between THREE types of “football” ie ‘rugby’, ‘soccer’ and ‘gaelic’ varieties.

    For many decades, football was a contentious political issue for Ireland and soccer represented repression by a foreign power to a sizeable number of Irish people.

    Now all three disciplines are treated equally and some footballers have managed to excel in more than one, though never to my knowledge in all three.

  6. Mandarin Says:

    Around Europe, the term football (using the words for foot and ball) refers to the worldwide sport that in the USA is called soccer, while the American version of football is usually called just American football, not gridiron. The game is very different, but still more closely related to rugby. I’ve seen an internet-meme describing the sport as “hand-egg,” which to European eyes is a pretty good description, as in football (European) only the goalie is allowed to touch the ball.

  7. Mandarin Says:

    Touch the ball with hands, that is, or in case the ball is out of court, in which case it allowed to be thrown into play. Inside the play court, touching the ball with hands is not allowed.

  8. xclusive Says:

    In South Africa were refer to it as football. As far as American Football is concerned. I can reassure you that by converting 15 of our average rugby players. We can defeat any top NFL(correct me if am wrong)clubs.

  9. rich Says:

    You’re kidding right? American football players are bigger,stronger,and much faster than Rugby players. This is fact! There are more deaths attributed to american football than rugby,look it up! Just look up Ray lewis and i dare you to find any rugby player built like that!

  10. Grant Says:

    If “soccer” is the slang for “assocation football” then soccer IS football. Therefore this whole debate seems to just be the Americans being awkward.
    In terms of world sport, you only have to go to Europe, Asia, South America and Africa to know that football is huge whereas gridiron is very niche. Although the Superbowl is getting more popular here in England each year, and I find that friends who do watch American Football refer to it as NFL. As in “Do you watch NFL?”

  11. Duane Says:

    “Football” refers to any game where the ball is kicked at some point during the game and is the term used for the most popular code in the region. In Australia we refer to Aussie Rules as “footy” or “football” if you’re from an AFL dominated area, or if you’re from Rugby League (different to Rugby, differentiated as Rugby Union) territory those are the words used for that code.

    Soccer is generally known as “the game girls, Poms and poofters play”.

  12. The Third Annual Jelly Donut Awards Recap the Top 5 Translation Errors of 2011 | Cinema RO Says:

    […] nothing quite like good sports rivalries, and soccer – or football, if you’d rather – has some of the best. Notably, England’s cross-town nemeses Manchester United and Manchester […]

  13. Allan H. Smith Says:

    A very interesting debate, is whether Rugby Football is more dangerous than American Football. Certainly, American Football players are generally bigger but there is no proof that they are any faster or fitter. In fact I would say the opposite is true. I think that the injuries involved in Rugby are different than in AF. I also think the padding worn in AF, that was originally designed to prevent and protect players from superficial injuries have in fact lead to more crippling spinal injuries in the modern game, because of the blatant use of the helmet while tackling. So, it’s not the difference in the rules that has caused this but it’s the stupidity of wearing helmets that are turned into weapons that has created needless spinal injuries and deaths.

  14. Paul D Says:

    I have to agree with Allan, protection is not all its cracked up to be. When someone is running at you with a helmet zoned in on you there is going to be a much more serious injury than someone who is not wearing a helmet, as they fear causing injuries to themselves. Therefore it would be the protective gear that is actually causing the injuries / deaths and not the size / speed / skill of the players

  15. Paul D Says:

    As for the football vs. soccer debate take a look at this:

  16. Professional_bird Says:

    Duane and other AFL v Soccer fans
    The game “football” has been documented as being played in UK & Europe since at least 13th century….how long has it being going in Oz????

  17. Seth Says:

    If the Brits hadn’t come up with the word “socca” to differentiate association football from rugby football, we wouldn’t have this rubbish debate. You seriously can’t get mad if a region calls their most popular code “football” and then has different names for everything else…when you came up with the alternate yourself (soccer). I’ll continue to call sports as I know them by, and who should care except for some loon who’s probably never played, and is too dumb to carry on in meaningful discussion. My only rule is have respect for what a sport is called when in the country of a specific event. My English friends at school who have accompanied me to various college and NFL games called it football. If i was to ever go to a Premier League game, I would call it football; same as if I went to an AFL game in Australia. On the couch watching the game (or better yet, flipping between soccer, rugby, and football if you are fortunate enough to have all those channels), enjoying a few cold ones is the appropriate place to get into this discussion. Otherwise, shut up, and enjoy!

  18. Master Says:

    Who created the language? The English or americans? Well, we call the language “English” not “American” ?

  19. Graham Says:

    @Seth is right; most of the other stuff on here is wrong, or at least misguided.

    @Jacob – the old form of football that started in medieval England (now known as ‘folk football’) was almost completely a handling game.

    There’s a very good explanation of all this on here:

    For the stories behind all these sports, I recommend (with no bias at all, obviously) my ebook – please click on my name for info.

  20. Leigh Says:

    Why do Americans fail to look beyond their own borders when writing this type of thing – you are not alone in your use of the term ‘soccer’? I grew playing and refereeing ‘soccer’ here in Australia – it will never be football to me. Football is either rugby league, union or Aussie rules. And even though there is a push by those who run the game to get us to call it ‘football’, most people over 30 or so would associate with the term soccer. No one seems to mind too much if you continue to call it such.

  21. Football vs soccer: the verbal battle continues | The Digital Bullpen Says:

    […] to Accredited Language Services, the origin of the term soccer can be dated back to 1889. In the meantime, the term “soccer” had […]

  22. RJ O'Connor Says:

    @ Xclusive

    You have no idea what you are talking about.
    In South Africa everybody refers to football as SOCCER in general speech.

    You can also not compare rugby and gridiron players. Two different styles of sport. Different ball sizes and different fitness tests.

    Each one will beat the other own with their respective sport.

  23. Jason Says:

    The God’s honest truth is that the word “soccer” is an Oxford abbreviation of the term Association Football, in an effort to differentiate it from rugby football in the 1880’s. Get over yourselves, Brits. You gave us the word soccer, we just ran with it.

  24. Footall Says:

    Blame it on the first guy who came up with the term “soccer” in 1889. Americans and Australians, at least start kicking the ball more than the “soccer”.

  25. Fatty Says:

    If you go by population, the majority of the English speaking world* calls it soccer. Football refers to something else (American football, Canadian football, Australian football).

    *English speaking world: countries where the majority of the population speaks English as a first language.

  26. Robert Says:

    In Canada it’s called Soccer but many teams use in their club names the ” FC” football club.

  27. Oxford – Stone Walls, Harry Potter, and an Archaeology Dig Says:

    […] and Cowley Marsh Sports Field. The field is a massive park with football (yes, I am talking about soccer, come on people, I’m flashing back to the United Kingdom here, it’s football), […]

  28. Ben Fox Says:

    People who say that the World Cup game is known as “football” around the world, like this author and most commentators here, are completely wrong.

    The game is known as “fútbol” or “futebol” around the world for certain, as the Spanish-speaking and Portuguese-speaking world plays it more fanatically than does the English-speaking world. In the English-speaking world, only the relatively tiny United Kingdom calls the sport football.

    Canada, Australia, and the granddaddy of ’em all, the United States, are unified in calling this sport soccer. So that’s what it is, internationally speaking.


  29. Cleo Says:


    RJ O’Connor is correct, in South Africa we use the term soccer, definitely not football.

  30. Robert Walski Says:

    I think it is also fair to mention that if you refer to futbol to any person living in the US they will instantly know what you mean futbol and football are two different things to us now.

  31. balldust Says:

    Master Says:
    August 23rd, 2012 at 6:16 am

    Who created the language? The English or americans? Well, we call the language “English” not “American” ?


    The Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Romans, Britons (speaking Brittonic)… oh, and there are a WHOLE lot of French borrowings into English.

  32. mystico Says:

    Ben Fox Says:

    People who say that the World Cup game is known as “football” around the world, like this author and most commentators here, are completely wrong.

    Canada, Australia, and the granddaddy of ‘em all, the United States, are unified in calling this sport soccer. So that’s what it is, internationally speaking.
    So because the majority of the “English-speaking world” refers to the game as soccer, “that’s what it is” internationally speaking? So whatever the English speakers use trumps the rest of the world–which by the way is the majority of the world? Doesn’t that smack a bit of ethnocentricity?

    I’m one of those few Americans who insists on referring to it as football, but in general I’d go with Seth’s comment that basically it doesn’t matter. Use the proper term when in the company of people who are likely to understand and accept that term and not start a debate.

  33. Lewis Says:

    Internationally it is known as football futebal fussball futbol futbollit fubball futbola it all translates to football the very few countries that do still call it soccer eg Australia newzealand have both changed to football an is catching on in public speak the only country to resist in calling it by its appropriate tittle is the US but they do that with everything as they think they are the self righteous e.g world police

  34. Paf Says:

    True, the Brits gave the term soccer but also gave the term rugger or rugby to refer to the game where the ball is carried by hand. It is a wonder why Americans do not call their game American rugby? It is also more logical as football (or soccer) is played by foot while rugby (or American football) is played by hand.

  35. Afl Vs Soccer Debate | AFL Footy Tipping Says:

    […] Soccer vs. Football: Naming the International Game – In the great soccer vs. football terminology debate, it seems that Americans are the only ones on the soccer side of the line – but who’s right? […]

  36. euroyank Says:

    In American “football” the players almost never use their foot to move the ball, except when your team fails… like punting when your side fails to progress & field goals when your side fails to score a touchdown.

  37. G. Simon Says:

    Nobody has mentioned the fact the American Football is played 95% by hand… so why is it Football?

    Soccer is 95% played by foot, so why call it Soccer? The logic of America, especially the NFL, escapes me.

  38. J Putnam Says:

    Who cares what Americans call soccer or what Europeans call football or whatever. Just because nearly 400 million people call it soccer doesn’t mean it is wrong. It is just DIFFERENT. What is so wrong being different? Nothing. If the rest of the world wants to call it Football, by all means. This insanely disputed debate is irrelevant.

  39. Anthony Says:

    What is the difference between SODA and POP? Regionalism… its actually the same thing …. no? It would be easier if we all agreed on a term.. but.. in the end.. it makes no difference to the game itself..

  40. BritOin Says:

    The best comment :

    by Paf:

    True, the Brits gave the term soccer but also gave the term rugger or rugby to refer to the game where the ball is carried by hand. It is a wonder why Americans do not call their game American rugby? It is also more logical as football (or soccer) is played by foot while rugby (or American football) is played by hand.

    Absolutely true…

  41. American Says:

    I am a huge soccer fan, and not much of an American Football fan, but, earlier in the comments I saw someone say something about the language is called English, not American, so yes, The brita gave us the language, but, we gave them an ass wooping… Twice.

  42. Johnny DeJay Says:

    Master Says:
    August 23rd, 2012 at 6:16 am

    Who created the language? The English or americans? Well, we call the language “English” not “American” ?


    You should be thanking us (twice) that you don’t speak German. Both of my Grandfathers and their brothers gave their lives protecting your freedom to criticize our terminology, but that’s just what we Americans believe in. You are welcome.

  43. Peet Says:

    Football, not Soccer. The end.

Leave a Reply